View Ridge Security
Back to Cyber HoseActive Exploits & Incidents

Clop claims 89GB Shell data theft in wider enterprise software

๐Ÿ’ฅ BREACHES & INCIDENTS

  • Clop claims 89GB Shell data theft in wider enterprise software campaign Clop claims to have stolen 89GB of data from Shell.

    • Shell, Philips, GE and Fiserv were among companies named by Clop.
    • The alleged Shell haul includes engineering drawings, facility images, test-report scans and project plans.
    • Clop claims to have stolen about 89GB from Shell and 13.5GB from Philips.
    • Researchers linked the campaign to a vulnerability in PTC Windchill and FlexPLM engineering software.
    • Clop allegedly exploited one unpatched flaw across nearly 50 companies for data-theft extortion. ๐Ÿ“Ž Coverage: thenextweb.com ยท ๐Ÿ‘ via BleepingComputer
  • NHS Blood and Transplant exposed patient data over unencrypted pagers NHS Blood and Transplant exposed patient data through unencrypted pagers.

    • UK transplant patients were affected, along with some ambulance, hospital and fire-service communications.
    • NHSBT transmitted names, dates of birth, organ types, tissue-match scores and risk factors.
    • Pager broadcasts also carried mental health, medication, address and patient-age details.
    • The legacy radio network was unencrypted and could be intercepted by anyone tuned to the frequency. ๐Ÿ“Ž Coverage: bbc.co.uk ยท ๐Ÿ‘ via @zackwhittaker@mastodon.social, @metacurity@infosec.exchange

๐Ÿ”“ CVEs & KEV

  • CVE-2026-72830 โ€” CVSS 9.3 โ€” Grav API Plugin before 1.0.13 RCE via ConfigController scope bypass
  • CVE-2026-72829 โ€” CVSS 9.3 โ€” Grav before 1.0.13 API Key Scope Bypass via UsersController
  • CVE-2026-72826 โ€” CVSS 9.3 โ€” Grav before 1.0.13 Scope Bypass via createApiKey
  • CVE-2026-72824 โ€” CVSS 9.3 โ€” Grav before 1.0.13 API Key Scope Bypass via PagesController
  • CVE-2026-72836 โ€” CVSS 9.2 โ€” FileBrowser before 2.63.19 Case Sensitivity Authentication Bypass
  • CVE-2026-72837 โ€” CVSS 8.7 โ€” File Browser before 2.63.20 Privilege Escalation via Proxy Authentication
  • CVE-2026-72833 โ€” CVSS 8.7 โ€” Grav 1.0.6 through 1.0.11 Privilege Escalation via Scoped API Keys
  • CVE-2026-72831 โ€” CVSS 8.7 โ€” Grav through 2.0.11 Authentication Bypass via Flex Objects
  • CVE-2026-72827 โ€” CVSS 8.7 โ€” Grav CMS before 2.0.13 Remote Code Execution via Twig
  • CVE-2026-72828 โ€” CVSS 8.6 โ€” Grav before 1.0.13 API Key Scope Bypass via InvitationsController
  • CVE-2026-72859 โ€” CVSS 8.3 โ€” Budibase 3.39.4 before 3.40.0 Authorization Regression via S3 Presigned URL
  • CVE-2026-72835 โ€” CVSS 7.6 โ€” filebrowser before v2.63.21 Access Rule Bypass via Path Canonicalization
  • CVE-2026-72825 โ€” CVSS 7.2 โ€” Grav before 1.0.13 API-key scope cap bypass via ReportsController
  • CVE-2026-72838 โ€” CVSS 7.1 โ€” FileBrowser before 2.63.19 Disk Exhaustion via TUS Upload
  • CVE-2026-73051 โ€” CVSS 6.3 โ€” actix-http before 3.12.1 HTTP Request Smuggling via CL.TE

๐Ÿ•ต๏ธ RESEARCH & DEEP DIVES

  • Trivy Compromise, Not LiteLLM, Drove Most of 2,500-Organization Exposure Most reported LiteLLM exposure stemmed from the earlier Trivy compromise.

    • Downstream organizations using Trivy, LiteLLM, or CI/CD platforms were potentially exposed.
    • TeamPCP affected GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Bitbucket, CircleCI, and Buildkite environments.
    • LiteLLM versions 1.82.7 and 1.82.8 contained credential-stealing code and were available on PyPI for about 40 minutes on March 24, 2026.
    • Data collection from 2,085 of 2,188 identified organizations ended before the malicious LiteLLM releases appeared.
    • A Python .pth payload ran at interpreter startup and exfiltrated cloud, SSH, Kubernetes, database, API, and CI/CD secrets to models.litellm[.]cloud. ๐Ÿ“„ Source: docs.litellm.ai ยท ๐Ÿ“Ž Coverage: securityweek.com ยท ๐Ÿ‘ via SecurityWeek
  • Dysphoria Botnet Compromises 296,000 IoT Devices for DDoS and C2 Relays The Dysphoria botnet has compromised roughly 296,000 IoT devices for DDoS attacks and C2 relaying.

    • Routers, gateways, cameras, repeaters, DVRs and other embedded Linux devices are affected.
    • About 296,000 compromised devices serve as DDoS bots and C2 relay nodes.
    • Operators exploit known flaws including CVE-2013-3307, CVE-2016-20016, CVE-2017-17215, CVE-2017-5259 and CVE-2018-14558.
    • Additional exploited flaws include CVE-2020-25499, CVE-2020-8515, CVE-2022-35733, CVE-2025-28137, CVE-2025-34152, CVE-2025-55182 and CVE-2025-9528.
    • Infected hosts proxy traffic to obscure backend C2 infrastructure and support DDoS operations. ๐Ÿ“„ Source: recordedfuture.com ยท ๐Ÿ“Ž Coverage: cybersecuritynews.com ยท ๐Ÿ‘ via Cyber Security News, cryptika.com (discovered)
  • Researchers demonstrate an adaptive AI-powered computer worm Researchers demonstrated an autonomous AI-powered computer worm.

    • The proof-of-concept targets heterogeneous network hosts.
    • It uses a locally hosted open-weight LLM to discover vulnerabilities and generate target-specific exploits.
    • The worm replicated across 61.8% of a 33-system test network and exploited 73.8% of hosts.
    • Compromised hosts ran local inference or routed queries to GPU-equipped nodes, enabling self-replication without centralized APIs. ๐Ÿ“„ Source: arxiv.org ยท ๐Ÿ“Ž Coverage: arxiviq.substack.com ยท ๐Ÿ‘ via Cyber Security News, cryptika.com (discovered)
  • DCRat Campaign Conceals Malware Archive in SVG Files via HTML Smuggling A DCRat campaign is using SVG attachments to deliver a hidden malware archive.

    • Phishing recipients are targeted with emails posing as legal notifications.
    • DCRat is concealed inside a malware archive embedded in an SVG file.
    • JavaScript in the SVG uses HTML smuggling to reconstruct or download the archive in the browser.
    • The image-like SVG format helps the malicious attachment evade traditional inspection. ๐Ÿ“„ Source: redcanary.com ยท ๐Ÿ“Ž Coverage: cryptika.com ยท ๐Ÿ‘ via Cyber Security News, cryptika.com (discovered)

๐Ÿ“‹ ADVISORIES

  • NIST Updates Ransomware Guidelines for Organizational Response NIST has updated its ransomware profile for organizational risk management and response.
    • Organizations across sectors are covered by the updated NIST ransomware profile.
    • The profile addresses ransomware risk before, during, and after an attack.
    • It provides a standardized framework for assessing reasonable ransomware response practices. ๐Ÿ“Ž Coverage: securityboulevard.com ยท ๐Ÿ‘ via securityboulevard.com (discovered)

Need help assessing your exposure?

Start with the free Posture Self-Check to see where you stand against the current threat landscape.

Free Posture Self-Check